By: Todd Wheatley
(c) IQ-2k   02-02-22

It's a little known fact and a bit counterintuitive, but Satan is a staunch PRO-LIFE ADVOCATE ... WITH NO EXCEPTIONS. He wants the products of rape and incest to be conceived and thrive. He wants the consensual sex with hidden monsters to bear his seed. He wants excessive breeding of the less fortunate to perpetuate poverty, despair, and misfortune. Most of all he wants those who attempt to terminate his spawn to die in misery and shame. Finally, as a means to carry out those desires, he wants the brainless puritanical horde to protect his prenatal spawn ....To do his bidding, if you will.

After all, what better way to hide?! The proverbial wolf in sheep's clothing. Let the so-called "morally superior" take the vanguard. Advance the chosen few in a no thought required fight. It's beyond easy since the "righteous" follow the rules (without question). As a reward they will receive "Him" in the afterlife .... and the rules say: WE ARE ALL GOD'S CHILDREN .... which means all those conceived under "His" watchful eye deserve the RIGHT TO LIFE.

Doesn't that make it simple to become a protector of the unborn?! But how far do you go?! Do you bomb abortion clinics or go in guns ablaze? Or do you simply annoy and harass? It's important to know how far you have to go to be the righteous protector of the unborn. More importantly, can you do as little as possible .... something like being a "single issue voter"? In other words, can simply vote Republican and leave it to the politicians?

Questions like those have plagued the nation for just under five decades. Though God would surely find favor with those who went to some effort. Perhaps as much favor as 72 virgins (sg. Islam) for those who went all the way. So having a "just cause" a few puritanical deviants took the extreme route in the 90s and early 2000s. Some with bombs. Others with guns. Fortunately the vast majority settled on vocal and "physical" harassment. Fortunately they could be as "nasty" as they wanted to advance their cause. All "violence" short of bodily harm would keep them out jail given the 1st amendment and all. So with tactics similar to a "picket line" the protesters had quasi-legal authority to block access to abortion providers and "physically" harass women seeking treatment.

Unlike other social movements (sg. BLM) these weren't random protesters off the street. They were well organized and committed. They remain so today in states that haven't legislated abortion out of existence. Starting in the 90s, however, municipal government took action as the "violence" crept upwards. Many municipalities provided "buffer zones" between the protesters and individuals seeking treatment with limited success. Since the "buffer zones" were codified either for a specific clinic or a narrow geographic region. Even then, most women's health clinics had unrelenting protest that pushed to the limit.

Right now it looks like the right to life group will succeed in removing the longstanding precedent for abortion in the United States (Roe 1973). So what's next on their agenda? Reversing gay marriage? Outlaw dating among teens? Banning rock & roll music, or any other deemed lewd, suggestive, or offensive?

Many years ago the "righteous" successfully launched a nationwide prohibition on alcohol to enable God's kingdom on earth. Mostly, however, they enabled organized crime and bloody turf wars that still exist. Clearly this isn't a recent phenomena. Centuries ago, the Inquisition brought torture and death in the name of God. Any and all means to deliver the compliant society they envisioned. Methods that still find use with organizations like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and the Taliban.

While the right to life group exhibits a similar religious fanaticism we should not overlook the broader social aspect implied in their struggle. Simply put: it is immoral to use abortion as a method of contraception. Especially in an era when multiple safe and effective methods exist. All socioeconomic issues aside. Mistakes, unfortunately, do happen and contraception is never 100% effective. Furthermore it must be absolutely agreed that women have no obligation to bear the children of monsters either by rape or through devious consent. Beyond that there are extenuating circumstances that also merit the termination of a pregnancy.

Besides, the puritanical horde invariably fails to consider "QUALITY OF LIFE" towards "THE RIGHT TO LIFE" .... think about it .... Have you ever considered that Satan induces an affliction to cause discord and suffering??

It doesn't have to be that way. Today, given the advancement of genetic testing, QUALITY OF LIFE has become an additional variable in the birthing process. There's no reason to subject the parents or the child a lifetime of pain and suffering that comes with a major affliction. Then there's the ridiculous cost of health care because "society" has chosen an unwavering "right to life" policy.

Finally there's the health of the mother to consider. Without belaboring that point, the issue of abortion has never been "black & white". It's NOT "right to life" or a woman's "choice". It's a moral quagmire that requires thought and consideration. In today's modern age, concerned citizens must affirm some moral authority towards child birth without resorting to an unyielding right to life. Or right to choose.

The SMART OPTION would be a policy to remove all socioeconomic barriers to contraception. Then mandatory education in family planning. Finally, some measure must be taken to make men more accountable towards the children they help conceive.

i.e.: CHOICE WITH RESPONSIBILITY

Unfortunately the political system stands in total ruin so the foremost legal minds have been called, once again, to render judgement .... AND THEY ARE FAILING IN A SPECTACULAR MANNER.!!

TEXAS SB4 2021 SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY SUMMARY JUDGMENT!!! INSTEAD SCOTUS HAS ALLOWED THE LAW TO STAND UNTIL THE PRESENTATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT. IN DOING SO, THE SUPREME COURT HAS GIVEN TACIT SUPPORT TO VIGILANTE JUSTICE .... given a failure in judgement this profound, we can only surmise that religious fanatics have access or been installed to the most honored U.S. institution and forever soiled its legacy.

As a noted caveat: the author, DR-KNOW (aka. Todd Wheatley), has no data to confirm that fervent anti-abortion activists are strictly from the faith community. In fact it would be interesting to have definitive polling on that issue. Nevertheless, very little stirs as much passion as religious faith. With that said, one could make the case of TRIBALISM as the source of anti-abortion fervor. It's a prospect far worse than a group of misguided religious fanatics. Today's tribal associations extend into government including the U.S. Supreme Court.

For some years conservative Republicans (tribe-C) have regarded an anti-abortion position towards entry into their ranks. I, personally, DON'T find value with the "Conservative" label. Though I'm sure as hell not a "Liberal" .... I belong the rarest group in America: THE THINKING MAN COALITION.

We don't give a rat's ass about the size of the government. We are only concerned whether it's effective. Unfortunately the federal government and most states governments are broken, devoid of thinkers, and in debt to a scary level. Even given the monetary troubles in the U.S., free access to contraception and family planning education is far cheaper than other options while eliminating most of the demand for abortion services.

Given the topic at hand, a thinking person would find great flaws in "Choice" and "Right to Life". While many people lack the motivation to be a "thinker" it still seems obvious that the middle of the road option, CHOICE WITH RESPONSIBILITY, offers compassion for human flaws, protection from demons, and room for scientific achievement bounded by a moral center.


(c) 2022    DR-KNOW
IQ-2k Information Services


TOP            HOME           [ topics ]
articles        podcasts        videos

Information eQuation (BOOK)
Information eQuation (examples)

EMAIL COMMENTS to DR-KNOW

Please support this web site: give any amount via PAYPAL ("money TRANSFER") to todd@dr-know.biz